BISAC SCI

WAVE REGIME OF VIETNAMESE WATERS ON THE BASIS OF NUMERICAL MODELING AND FIELD MEASUREMENTS Wave Regime of Vietnamese Waters on the Basis of Numerical Modeling and Field Measurements

Published in Russian Journal of Earth Sciences · Volume 22, Issue 6 · Pages 1–13 · Rubric: ORIGINAL ARTICLES
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2205/2022ES000816
Received: 08.09.2022 Accepted: 02.10.2022 Published: 31.12.2022 Language of publication: ENG
This paper presents results of research of the wave regime in Vietnamese waters (South China Sea) based on the data of numerical modeling data using the WAM model (WAVE Modeling). The model domain covers the basin of the South China Sea (SCS). The bathymetry of the SCS used in the model is based on the ETOPO5 digital database. Wind parameters are based on the six-hour NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data with a resolution of ΔX = ΔY = 0.25° over the period 1979–2021. The field wave data measurements were collected by the Institute of Oceanography of Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology in the southern central Vietnamese waters in 2013. The statistical data of computed wave characteristics for the period of 43 years (1979–2021) illustrate that the main wave direction in Vietnamese waters was NE during the Northeastern (NE) monsoon, and in the opposite direction during the Southwestern (SW) monsoon. The NE monsoon wave was more dominant than that of the SW monsoon wave. Recurrence frequency (%) of significant wave height Hs >1.0 m (Hs – significant wave height is an average of 1/3 the largest of serial waves relative to average seawater level) greater than 50% covered the northeastern, central region of the SCS, and central Vietnamese coast. The wave recurrence frequency in the Gulf of Tonkin and Gulf of Thailand was <40% and <30%, respectively. The central Vietnamese coast from Ly Son Island to Phu Quy Island was the strongest affected by wave action. The recurrence frequency of the maximum significant wave height Hs >3.5 m was greater than 1.5%. The Gulf of Tonkin (Bach Long Vi Island) and the Gulf of Thailand (Tho Chu Island) were less affected by wave action than the central Vietnamese coast: the recurrence frequency of the maximum wave height (Hs>3.5 m) was less than 0.1%. Phu Quy and Con Dao Islands were more influenced by wave action during both seasons than the central coast of Vietnam.
Vietnamese waters, South China Sea (SCS), wave regime, significant wave height, monsoon, WAM model
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Gerhard Gayer (Department of Model System, Institute of Hydrophysics, GKSS, Germany) for his kind help and encouragement throughout the preparation of the WAM Cycle 4.5 model. And the grateful acknowledgment is to Vietnam Electricity (EVN) and Power Engineering Consulting JSC 2 (PECC2) for permission to publish of the observed wave data. The work was carried out within the framework of the Russian- Vietnamese cooperation FEBRAS-VAST (project numbers: VAST19-020 and QTRU02.04/19-20) and the state budget themes of POI FEBRAS (Project No:121021700341-2), and Geophysical Center of RAS, adopted by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. This work was also supported by the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, grant number NVCC17.04/22-22. This paper is a contribution to celebrate the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Oceanography, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology and the 50th Anniversary of the V. I. Il’ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. The main author, Senior Researcher Dr. Le Dinh Mau, is also thankful to the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology for supporting his scientific activities for the year 2022.
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Booij, N., R. C. Ris, and L. H. Holthuijsen (1999), A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 104(C4), 7649-7666, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02622.

2. Chu, P. C., and K.-F. Cheng (2008), South China Sea wave characteristics during typhoon Muifa passage in winter 2004, Journal of Oceanography, 64(1), 1-21, doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-008-0001-9. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MCGZUZ

3. Chu, P. C., S. Lu, and W. T. Liu (1999), Uncertainty of South China Sea prediction using NSCAT and National Centers for Environmental Prediction winds during tropical storm Ernie, 1996, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 104(C5), 11,273-11,289, doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/1998JC900046.

4. Guenther, H. (2002), WAM Cycle 4.5. User Manual, Technical report, Institute for Coastal Research GKSS, Research Centre Geesthacht, Germany.

5. Guenther, H., S. Hasselmann, and P. A. E. M. Janssen (1992), The WAM Model Cycle 4.0, User Manual, Technical report no.4, Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany.

6. Hasselmann, K., et al. (1973), Measurements of windwave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP), Deutsches Hydrographische Zeitschrift, 8, 1-95.

7. Le, D. M. (2006), Computation of wave characteristics in the offshore region using numerical wave model WAM, Vietnam Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 6(3), doihttps://doi.org/10.15625/1859-3097/6375, (in Vietnamese).

8. Le, D. M., and V. T. Nguyen (2018), Distribution features of measured wave characteristics in coastal waters of Ninh Thuan Province, Viet Nam, Vietnam Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 18, 13-20, doihttps://doi.org/10.15625/1859-3097/13633.

9. Le, D. M., V. Sanil Kumar, G. N. Nayak, and S. Mandal (2004), Estimation of wave characteristics during hurricane in the Hoian area, central Vietnam, in Proceeding of the Third Indian National Conference on Harbour and Ocean Engineering, pp. 105-113.

10. Le, D. M., H. L. Tran, and M. C. Nguyen (2015), Present state of ocean observation and service in Viet Nam, Vietnam Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 15(4), 309-319, doihttps://doi.org/10.15625/1859-3097/7376.

11. Londhe, S. N., and V. Panchang (2006), One-Day Wave Forecasts Based on Artificial Neural Networks, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 23(11), 1593-1603, doihttps://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1932.1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YBHUIT

12. Mandal, S. N., and N. Prabaharan (2003), An overview of the numerical and neural network Accosts of ocean wave prediction, in Sixth International Conference on Costal and Port Engineering in Developing Countries (COPEDEC VI 2003), Colombo, Sri Lanka 15th to 19th September 2003, 101, p. 9, Lanka Hydraulic Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

13. Mirzaei, A., F. Tangang, L. Juneng, M. A. Mustapha, M. L. Husain, and M. F. Akhir (2013), Wave climate simulation for southern region of the South China Sea, Ocean Dynamics, 63(8), 961-977, doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-013-0640-2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YCWFJQ

14. Morozov, E. G., and M. G. Velarde (2008), Inertial oscillations as deep ocean response to hurricanes, Journal of Oceanography, 64(4), 495-509, doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-008-0042-0. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LLHVEP

15. National Geophysical Data Center (1993), 5minute Gridded Global Relief Data (ETOPO5), doihttps://doi.org/10.7289/V5D798BF.

16. Shao, Z., B. Liang, H. Li, G. Wu, and Z. Wu (2018), Blended wind fields for wave modeling of tropical cyclones in the South China Sea and East China Sea, Applied Ocean Research, 71, 20-33, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2017.11.012.

17. SPM (1984), Shore Protection Manual, in Army Coastal Engineering Research Centre, Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, vol. 1-2, Washington, DC, USA.

18. SWAMP Group and others (1985), Ocean Wave Modeling, 256 pp., Plenum Press, New York.

19. Tolman, H. L. (1991), A Third-Generation Model for Wind Waves on Slowly Varying, Unsteady, and Inhomogeneous Depths and Currents, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 21(6), 782-797, doihttps://doi.org/10.1175/15200485(1991)021<0782:ATGMFW>2.0.CO;2.

20. Vlasova, G. A., B. X. Nguyen, M. N. Demenok, B. H. Long, D. M. Le, and T. T. D. Nguyen (2020), Tropical cyclone in the north of the south china sea as a factor affecting the structure of the vietnamese current, Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 56(4), 390- 400, doihttps://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433820040106. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UKSNJH

21. WAMDI Group (1988), The WAM Model-A Third Generation Ocean Wave Prediction Model, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18(12), 1775-1810, doihttps://doi.org/10.1175/15200485(1988)018<1775:TWMTGO>2.0.CO;2.

22. Young, I. R. (1988), Parametric Hurricane Wave Prediction Model, Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 114(5), 637-652, doihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1988)114:5(637).

23. Zhou, L., Z. Li, L. Mou, and A. Wang (2014), Numerical simulation of wave field in the South China Sea using WAVEWATCH III, Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 32(3), 656-664, doi:3155-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-014-3155-x; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YALXTM